Life Issues

The ACLU: Foe of Freedom

The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU, is a noble sounding organization. So noble, in fact, that it’s very name draws upon my own patriotic heartstrings and personal love of liberty. The words “American”, “Liberty”, and “Union” inspire us and without thought we are saying “with liberty and justice for all”…the American dream. However, behind this noble facade is a sinister group that stabs freedom in the back while shouting “Liberty!” from atop it’s victim’s corpses.

*****Contains graphic and explicit content*****

The ACLU is vehemently opposed to marriage as one man and one woman. It heralds itself as “the first mainstream organization to seek the legal recognition of same-sex marriage.”1 To achieve this, it proudly removed sodomy laws throughout the nation.2 Further, the ACLU’s policy guide stated: “the ACLU believes that criminal and civil laws prohibiting or penalizing the practice of plural marriage [polygamy or polyamory] violate constitutional freedoms of expression and association, freedom of religion, and privacy of personal relationships among consenting adults.”3 In essence, the ACLU utterly denies marriage and seeks to redefine it as between not only one man and one woman, but between two men, two women, three men, one man and forty women, or any variation imaginable. Since the possibilities are endless, marriage, in such a context, would not even exist. An ACLU Board member said, “The First Amendment creates an inescapable moral relativism, societal and cultural, for our nation taken as a whole. For example, I view homosexual sexual activity as not only not immoral, or sinful, or wrong, or undesirable, but as affirmatively moral, and virtuous, and right, and desirable.”4

The same organization that fights for the “liberty” to have multiple spouses, fights against parents’ ability to guide and protect their children. “The ACLU has stated, ‘The United States Constitution does not mention the right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children.”5 It replaces the parents with the state and fights to prevent parents from opting out of abhorrent sex education programs in public schools. It defended Hot, Sexy, and Safer Productions Inc. (HSSPI) in a Chelmsford, MA case and the elementary school production “Cootie Shots”.6 Both of these events were sexually explicit, promoted homosexuality, premarital sex, cross-dressing, and HSSPI “used profanity, described oral and anal sex, and had students act out sexual activities.”7 “Parents were not notified about [these] assemb[lies] or the graphic sexual information their children would receive.”8 These were mandatory for all students to attend and when parents rightly got upset after their children were exposed to such perverse programs without their consent or knowledge, the ACLU fought against the parents’ right to raise their children morally.

Though there is much more to be said about the ACLU’s agenda, the following is the most disturbing and evil. This section contains especially graphic and disturbing content.

The North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), “which encourages sexual relations between adult men and young boys,”9 was sued for “actively training their members how to rape children and get away with it.”10 One such victim was a ten-year old named Jeffery Curley who was violently kidnapped, sexually assaulted, murdered, and was again molested even in death.11 Jaynes, one of the men who did this to young Jeffery, “said he had reservations about having sex with children until he discovered NAMBLA.”12 The materials that the lawsuit challenged included a publication that “explain[ed] how to build relationships with children. How to gain the confidence of children’s parents. Where to go to have sex with children so as not to get caught.”13 Further, the NAMBLA website “actually posted techniques designed to lure boys into having sex with men and also supplied information on what an adult should do if caught.”14

Yet, the ACLU stated, “There was nothing in those publications [of NAMBLA] or Web site which advocated or incited the commission of any illegal acts, including murder or rape…Regardless of whether people agree with or abhor NAMBLA’s views, holding the organization responsible for crimes committed by others who read their materials would gravely endanger important First Amendment freedoms.”15 Sticking in line with this perverse defense of evil, a representative of the ACLU “advocated the free exchange of pornography, all pornography. He was promptly asked about material depicting [molested and even murdered] children…[He] said, with a straight face, that it is the ACLU’s position that child pornography should not be produced, but once it is in existence, there should be no restriction on its sale and distribution. In other words, the photographic record of a child’s molestation and abuse should be a legal source of profit for those who wish to reproduce, sell, print and distribute it for the world to see. And that, he said, was the intent of the First Amendment of the Constitution!”16

The ACLU literally stands atop a mountain of corpses. These include boys like Jeffery Curley and the millions of babies that have been aborted some of which were partially delivered —all but the head— and had their brains sucked out with a vacuum. An originally pro-choice nurse described this very scenario, partial birth abortion, a practice that the ACLU believes is good and is a “right”.

“Dr. Haskell went in with forceps and grabbed the baby’s legs and pulled them down into the birth canal. Then he delivered the baby’s body and the arms — everything but the head. The doctor kept the baby’s head just inside the uterus. The baby’s little fingers were clasping and unclasping, and his feet were kicking. Then the doctor stuck the scissors through the back of his head, and the baby’s arms jerked out in a flinch, a startle reaction, like a baby does when he thinks he might fall. The doctor opened up the scissors, stuck a high-powered suction tube into the opening and suck the baby’s brains out. Now the baby was completely limp… Dr. Haskell delivered the baby’s head…He threw that baby back in the pan, along with the placenta and instruments he’d used. I saw the baby move in the pan. I asked another nurse and she said it was just “reflexes”…The woman wanted to see her baby, so they cleaned up the baby and put it in a blanket and handed the baby to her. She cried the whole time, and she kept saying, “I’m so sorry, please forgive me!””17

The ACLU is not a defender of liberty. The ACLU is not good. The ACLU is evil and we must fight against its perverse agenda; an agenda that primarily seeks not only to remove our children’s innocence and morals, but seeks to violently take their very lives.

For those who are interested The ACLU vs. America can be purchased from Alliance Defending Freedom and the proceeds help fund their many legal battles against the ACLU.

1 Sears, Alan & Osten, Craig.The ACLU vs. America: Exposing the Agenda to Redefine Moral Values. 2005. Broadman & Holman Publishers: Nashville, TN.
2 Ibid.
3 Ibid.
4 Ibid.
5 Ibid.
6 Ibid.
7 Ibid.
8 Ibid.
9 Ibid.
10 Ibid.
11 Ibid.
12 Ibid.
13 Ibid.
14 Ibid.
15 Ibid.
16 Ibid.
17 Ibid.

Montana Legislative Update: March 3rd, 2015
A Shift Back Towards the Practical Science of Politics
Life Issues
Attacking Schools and Hospitals
There are currently no comments.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.